![]() Policymakers, regulators, child safety groups and consumer rights groups have argued that it hooks children on the app at a younger age rather than protecting them from problems with the service, including child predatory grooming, bullying and body shaming. YouTube, which Google owns, has released a children’s version of its app.īut since BuzzFeed broke the news this year that Facebook was working on the app, the company has faced scrutiny. Parents would be able to control what accounts their child followed. Facebook said the “kids” app was intended for ages 10 to 12 and would require parental permission to join, forgo ads and carry more age-appropriate content and features. With Instagram Kids, Facebook had argued that young people were using the photo-sharing app anyway, despite age-requirement rules, so it would be better to develop a version more suitable for them. Regulators, lawmakers, journalists and civil society groups around the world have criticized the company for its effects on society. In recent years, the social network has become perhaps the world’s most heavily scrutinized corporation, grappling with privacy accusations, hate speech, misinformation and allegations of anticompetitive business practices. The decision to halt the app’s development is a rare reversal for Facebook.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |